this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

4035 readers
5 users here now

There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!

Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.


Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!


Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice ๐Ÿ‰.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That would be "everybody" with the context being that the agreements regarding refugees were built by international effort in 1951.

It's called the refugee convention.

It happened post ww2 due to the massive displacement of people because of the war.

A refugee has a set of rights, and have a status that ensures those rights in international law, and with any given nation having others as well.

Since refugee status isn't the same as permanent residency status, or citizenship, requiring them to swear to some kind of integration is essentially impossible, and would also be not only impossible to enforce, but absolutely stupid as well.

[โ€“] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It seems odd that someone from Syria needs to seek asylum all the way across the Atlantic Ocean for what is essentially a local issue, particularly the idea it cannot be a neighboring safe region that happens to lack a certain je ne sais quois. At a certain point it seems there is convenience being sought, who else is guranteed convenience or preference when their life is otherwise ostensibly on the line and gets to have that indulged?

The idea that of course they cant be integrated, thats idiotic, I honestly dont know what to say to that other than that should be part of the deal. It should go without saying that someone seeking asylum should be aware theres participation on their part expected, otherwise they are free to shop around other venues where they can get the band back together and revive the practices and customs and issues that led to their needing to leave the original place. Theres not a way I can make that make sense in my head

[โ€“] guy@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine fleeing Belgium in WW2 and being asked to stay in France since it's a local problem

[โ€“] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)