this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
-37 points (23.2% liked)
Fediverse
41510 readers
466 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I personally wouldn't mind, as long as that wasn't your only intention, and you did it in the correct communities / weren't trolling.
It's not my intention, but I think it should be allowed.
I've been a fan of the Harry Potter series since the first movie. Not a huge fan, but I enjoyed the first four (books and movies, the latter 3/4 not so much) and some of the associated media.
These days you can't say you're a fan of Harry Potter without someone throwing JK Rowling's transphobia in your face. The problem is, I agree with them. JK Rowling is a trash human. I still like the stories she told and I enjoy some of the movies. I enjoyed the recent game, Hogwarts Legacy. I enjoy that the developers included a trans character to spite Rowling.
I don't think every Potterhead should be harassed for JK Rowling's views, but I also think it's difficult to engage with the community without considering it, given that the author is so public with her views. It's the same with Orson Scott Card and Ender's Game. Similar fandom (academia in space rather than witch/wizard fantasy), similar issue (author is homophobic). Similarly, the LGBTQ+ community tried to cancel the fandom, and these days, fans acknowledge Card was wrong, but the books still hold merit. Also, just like JK Rowling's author insert character Hermione is completely opposite to the author's views, so too was Ender (who was kind of like a meek version of Harry).
But nah, my favourite bone to pick with the Potterverse isn't that the author is human garbage (which is technically outside of the Potterverse), it's that Gryffindor = good, Slytherin = evil, and the other two Houses don't matter. As a Ravenclaw (or rather, I would be a Ravenclaw if I went to Hogwarts), this annoys me. It also seems to me that the better backdrop for the story would be if Harry and Draco were more directly rivals, Harry was about to be placed in Slytherin for his ambition (to best Draco) but he gets placed in Gryffindor instead. (This is more or less how it already goes.) But then Ron gets placed in Hufflepuff and Hermione in Ravenclaw, because that just makes more sense, and the four of them basically work together, often over the objections of their Houses being against them working together rather than sticking with their own House. I'm also suggesting that Draco explore his shades of grey rather than being "the bully." It makes more sense for the other Slytherins to use him (and his father's position) to reach their own goals than it does for Draco to merely be a shadow of his father.