this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
140 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

6552 readers
472 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Any news that are at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies or tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Roku software update blocked antenna TV access without an internet connection, exposing how smart TV business models prioritize connectivity and data over basic broadcast functionality that should work offline by default.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ozymandias@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Never buy a smart tv... Pretty simple

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Assuming you still can, I mean, the only modern-day 'dumb TVs' in existence are large conference room monitors, and those are actually about the same price as a high-end TV in some cases while having mostly the same capabilities, OK, I guess that's viable.

[–] ozymandias@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Looks like you want a "Commercial Display" or "Hospitality TV".
And yes it costs more money, but that's because you're not trading your privacy and security for a discount on the tv.
Apparently a projector is a common choice too, that's what I use. Zero option to connect to the internet, mine cost $40 new @ 1080p... It's not the best resolution but it's great for watching movies. Mine is just connected to my computer directly, no need for any of those streaming apps thanks to qbittorent.
...
I'll be deep in the cold cold ground before I buy any device that requires an app or requires internet.

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you're in the market for a high-end TV, it's not even a discount price-wise in some cases as most high-end TVs are in the same price range as one of those commercial displays, you're basically spending the same type of money on one of those commercial displays that you would on a high-end TV, but you're getting a dumb display in return.