this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
74 points (96.2% liked)

Selfhosted

60623 readers
730 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm wondering what folks do to optimise the power efficiency of their Linux servers. I've never really got to the bottom of what is the best way to do this and with the current energy crisis its a pertinent topic.

I'm talking about home servers, so the availability requirements are not the same as in a corporate environment. There might be vast chunks of time during the day or night when they sit idle, and home users are more tolerant of a lag when accessing resources if it means lower energy bills.

Specifically I've been thinking about:

  • allowing lower power states when idle
  • spinning-down hdd's when they're not in use
  • MAYBE letting machines sleep/hibernate
  • setting schedules of times where you know demand will be low/zero and efficiency can be managed aggressively
  • any other quick wins I've missed

It would be amazing if there was one tool or one guide that helps with all of that but thats never the case, is it ๐Ÿ˜…

Thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, ppl usually don't really look at PSU efficiency curves.

Random example:

If you are gonna run on 20W most of the time you can calculate how much of a difference a certain PSU can make you (if you find a proper test that is).

That said, I do not recommend to use shitty PSUs, safety first, the components & layout need to be good (most of consumer PSUs are fairly garbage).
A bit like you wouldn't use regular consumer HDDs.
(For most ez homelab cases every other component can be cheap consumer grade tho, exemptions ofc exist.)

[โ€“] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, I think the correct sticker on a PSU would be something like 80 Plus Ruby?! Everything else comes with 80+% efficiency at 20% rated load. Which is 200W for a 1000W PSU. And there's no guarantee on what happens below that, so it might very well be utter garbage at a home server power draw of 20-30W.

You never know without looking up the datasheets. Though, back when I built my home server/NAS, I failed to find a good one. I got a PicoPSU and a 12V power brick instead. Not sure if that's still a thing. But I remember it was a lot of work to find proper and efficient components. And it doesn't make any sense to put in all the effort (and money) and then burn all the saved energy, and then some more, in an average PSU.

Some MiniPCs, NUCs and even computers also come with fairly efficient power supplies.