The Trump-Epstein Files™

1261 readers

70 users here now

We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.

Want to start digging yourself? Check out our sticky post

Our Rules

(Subject to Change)

#1 Be kind: keep it civil and amicable. The enemy is not in this community but in Palaces, The White House and penthouses.
#2 Trigger Warnings: required. Mark posts which may be triggering to read or see for victims of sexual abuse with "[TW]" in front of your post title. If you're posting an image or video with explicit thumbnail, you will have to set the entire post as NSFW AND include the TW.
#3 Cite sources: preferably direct link to the article/pdf and or an archive link in case there is a paywalled. In the article find a relevant few paragraphs and quote them in your post.
#4 Post the Bates numbers: when referencing evidence (even if it is mentioned in an article), please post
- the Bates number of the file you’re referring to (EFTA00000000)
- a link to the original source
- a link to a mirror of the file in case DOJ pulls the file.
#5 include key paragraphs: when posting articles, include a few key paragraphs of the article (not the entire article)
#6 avoid links to social media as sources. Links to twitter must use xcancel.com.

Our Justice System

First offence: warning + 2 day ban
Second offence: 7 day ban
Third offence: permanent ban from community
Creating multiple accounts to interact with this community: permanent ban for all accounts in community + report to your instance admin.

This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.

founded 9 months ago

MODERATORS

kingofras@lemmy.world

epstein_bot@lemmy.world

243

'I Killed Pons Years Ago' — Epstein's boast about ending Clean Energy research emerges in federal files (www.ibtimes.co.uk)

submitted 2 months ago by AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works to c/Epsteinfiles@lemmy.world

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

On the morning of 1 October 2009, Epstein wrote to Seckel: 'regarding cold fusion. i killed pons years ago.' When Seckel pressed him for details — 'How did you kill him?' — Epstein replied with specifics, writing that 'the origidnal senate funding came out of congress, and wayne owens senator from utah ,, i was there an argues against, it, had ot meet with the head of the mormon church.'

The target of Epstein's claimed intervention was Stanley Pons, the University of Utah electrochemist who, alongside Martin Fleischmann, announced in March 1989 that they had achieved nuclear fusion at room temperature. The announcement generated global headlines and the prospect of virtually limitless clean energy. Within months, mainstream physics institutions moved to discredit the findings, funding was withdrawn, and Pons eventually relocated to a French laboratory funded by Toyota.

Wayne Owens, the figure Epstein names, was a Democratic congressman representing Utah's 2nd district from 1987 to 1993 — Epstein refers to him as a 'senator,' though Owens served in the House. The congressional dimension of the cold fusion controversy is documented: the University of Utah sought $25 million (approximately £18.8 million) from Congress to fund further research, and the state legislature had separately appropriated $5 million (approximately £3.75 million). Brigham Young University, governed by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, was also entangled in the dispute through physicist Steven Jones, who had been conducting parallel cold fusion research. Epstein's reference to meeting the head of the Mormon Church aligns with BYU's institutional role in the congressional funding fight.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Laws like the Lex Acilia Calpurnia (67 BC) and Lex Pompeia (52 BC) imposed penalties including 10-year or lifetime bans on holding office, heavy fines, and forced exile.

Not sure if that's what you mean, but honestly, I always say I would be more than happy to just see these evil elites have their assets seized, all future wages garnished and paid to victims, and any right to hold or attempt to influence public office stripped away and I absolutely mean it.

(Definitely preferable to the punishments they receive now. Usually nothing followed by public buildings, statues, and streets named in their honor after they depart.)

I think having to live and struggle to survive amongst the poors would be a fate worse than death for a lot of these life long nepo babies.

Also, my understanding is that the more barbaric (although admittedly more swift) forms of punishments I normally associate with the Roman justice system, were very rare for elites to ever face. They were mainly reserved for slaves and the general public. (Bc some things never change I guess)

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm suggesting the french should have crucified the rich instead of cutting their heads off.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah I figured it was either that or thrown to the lions