this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
257 points (98.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

41765 readers
180 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

idk if it is serious or not, but it is what I saw in indeed newsletter today.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 46 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Dijkstra on the foolishness of natural language programming

But like, what does he know? He wasn’t an AI-native vibe orchestrator.

[–] tracyspcy@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

Thx for sharing this . Really hope people read it.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

All he made was some dinky algorithm. Google Bard could do that in three minutes flat smh.

[–] ThermonuclearHoxha@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

See, Dijkstra was talking about people trying to create programs in natural language. He didn't say not to use your natural language to hire someone else to make a formal program. This is people using natural language to hire an LLM to make a formal program, and asking LLMs is like asking people, so it's Dijkstra-approved. smuglord

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And even this improvement wasn't universally appreciated: some people found error messages they couldn't ignore more annoying than wrong results, and, when judging the relative merits of programming languages, some still seem to equate "the ease of programming" with the ease of making undetected mistakes.

This guy was writing in the year x86 was first introduced, and I still feel like I see this attitude around.

(He manages to shoehorn in a "kids these days" paragraph too, though)