C Programming Language

1286 readers

2 users here now

Welcome to the C community!

C is quirky, flawed, and an enormous success.
... When I read commentary about suggestions for where C should go, I often think back and give thanks that it wasn't developed under the advice of a worldwide crowd.
... The only way to learn a new programming language is by writing programs in it.

irc: #c

🌐 https://en.cppreference.com/w/c

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Copying values pointed to by addresses stored in two variables (confusion with pointers). (programming.dev)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by iliketurtiles@programming.dev to c/c_lang@programming.dev

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I thought the book I'm reading had typos when I read code that uses this:

uint32_t src = 0xf0;
uint32_t dest = 0x400;

int main() {
    *&dest = *&src;
}

However if you take a look at the decompiled version on godbolt: link this correctly takes the value at the address stored in src, and copies it to the address in dest.

I'd love some help understanding what going on. The code looks like nonsense to me, "*&" should "cancel out" IMO.

========

Meanwhile here's what I thought the correct code would be:

uint32_t src = 0xf0;
uint32_t dest = 0x400;

int main() {
    *(uint32_t*) dest = *(uint32_t*) src;
}

Doesn't do what's expected, see decompiled: link. What's wrong with this?

When the RHS is a constant it works fine, and seems to be a common pattern people use.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] iliketurtiles@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago

thanks for the reply. my goal is in fact to take what is at address 0xf0 and store it at 0x400. I know it resembles another beginner error but it's not this time :)

the example code I've given looks pretty contrived but I'll be using this to write startup code for a microcontroller, and the values starting at src are initial values in flash I need to copy over to dest which is SRAM.