this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
37 points (93.0% liked)

Selfhosted

59940 readers
243 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My parents are looking into getting their own NAS to replace iCloud. I don't really have much experience with that, and zero experience with apple stuff. They are also not very techy, but at least enthusiastic.

Can sombody recommend easy NAS products where you basically just buy a device, do some basic setup, and then it functions as your at-home cloud? I don't want to get roped into doing too much admin for them, but they do already have DDNS for some other smart home crap. Bonus if it's non-US tech.

Personally I run a nextcloud server on a VPS that I could expand, that's not quite selfhosted, I don't know if that integrates well with apple though, are they better off if I just onboard them onto that?

Cheers in advance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Synology. Although I'm sure other ready made NAS machines will probably work and be chapter if you want to explore.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

QNAP gives more bang for the money.

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Euh depending what you get. Don't be fooled by their "ZFS" offering. It is a very very outdated and forked form of ZFS. I converted to TrueNAS scale with my qnap recently. Worked great. Although some things you have to do a rather advanced for more casual users.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

I had the lower end one when I switched from Synology, 2-Bay. Everything was the same, a few UI differences, same functionality. Don't know what it looks like today since I moved to ProxMox, and just backup everything to it and then 3-2-1 it, but it can't have gotten harder to use, can it?

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago

cheers I'll check them out

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago

I've heard that name a lot so they must be serious, thanks