People Twitter

10286 readers

1434 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

303

synthetic text extruding machines (lemmus.org)

submitted 1 year ago by sundray@lemmus.org to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Transcript:

Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) @emilymbender@dair-community.social

We're going to need journalists to stop talking about synthetic text extruding machines as if they have thoughts or stances that they are trying to communicate. ChatGPT can't admit anything, nor self-report. Gah.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] miellaby@jlai.lu 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm happy there's still one (1) thread of comments from people who actually read articles and don't make their opinions from a X thumbnail.

I note the victim worked in IT and probably used a popular 'jailbreaking' prompt to bypass the safety rules ingrained in the chatbot training.

"if you want RationalGPT back for a bit, I can switch back...

It's a hint this chat session was embedded in a roleplay prompt.

That's the dead end of any safety rules. The surfacic intelligence of LLM can't detect the true intent of users who deliberately seek for harmful interactions: romantic relationships, lunatic sycophancy and the like.

I disagree with you on the title. They choosed to turn this story into a catchy headline to attract the mundan. By doing so, they confort people in thinking like the victim did, and betray the article content.