this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
38 points (97.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

11624 readers
2409 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Home owned windmills are almost a total waste. Its surprising how little electricity they generate especially given how much the cost to buy and install. Some real numbers. A 400w can cost almost $18k to buy and install. A 410w solar solar panel is about $250 + $3k of supporting electronics and parts. And that same $3k can support 10+ more panels. I looked into it myself really wanted it to be worth it for home, but it just isn't. Now utility grade wind? Absolutely worth it. You need absolutely giant windmills with massive towers, but once you have those, you can make a LOT of electricity very cost effectively.

Solar panels worth it? Yes. Absolutely.

Batteries, not quite there yet for most folks. Batteries are really expensive, and don't hold very much electricity $10k-$15k can get you a few hours of light or moderate home use capacity. For folks with really expensive electricity rates or very unreliable power this can be worth it financially, but for most every else. Cheaper chemistry batteries are finally starting to be produced (Sodium Ion), but we're right at the beginning of these and there not really any consumer products for home made from these yet.

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, right now end of life EV batteries are great for making your own power storage but that's a level of diy beyond what 95% of people are willing or able to do

What's infuriating is that we had electric cars before ICE powered cars. 1899. If we would've been investing money and effort into research for battery technology since then, we wouldn't have this problem. Salt batteries, solid state batteries, and other promising tech is in it's infancy because we just started to take this seriously as a society like 10 years ago.

Better late than never but it grinds my gears that the best argument against solar and wind is power storage requirements due to unpredictable power generation. Like this is an extremely solvable problem.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah, right now end of life EV batteries are great for making your own power storage but that’s a level of diy beyond what 95% of people are willing or able to do

End of life EV batteries are great for grid-scale operators doing power storage, but I highly recommend homeowners use them this way. Not just because they are complex DIY projects as you point out, but because the EV batteries that are aging out of car use are NMC chemistry. These are great for high density power storage, which you want in a car, but they are susceptible to thermal runaway if they get too hot. The original Tesla Powerwall and Powerwall 2 also used these same chemistry batteries. I wouldn't want these in my house. However, in a utility grid scale? Sure, they won't be anywhere near people so in the unlikely event they do catch fire its a property problem, not a lost human life problem.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
[–] knightly@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Did you not look at the specs on that product? It only produces energy when winds are above 7mph and don't actually hit the rated output unless the winds are almost 35mph.

Less than a quarter the country averages an amount of wind power per square meter equivalent to the rating on home turbines (yellow and red on this map), and that's only on average.

Compare to this map of average insolation, showing that solar power per square meter is at least 3x as high as wind energy for the same area and at most over 6x:

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a hybrid solar and wind. Also, that's why you have batteries for storage.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not skip the middleman and go straight solar, then?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] knightly@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Look at Seattle and tell me which parts have enough wind power for your home windmill:

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 0 points 1 year ago

Chiming in on this... Installed home energy in Europe. Close to the coast, so rather windy. Rather far to the north, so not that sunny. Home solar usually pays for itself after 6 to 10 years, with installations usually being guaranteed to last 20 and of course usually lasting even longer. Home wind is a niche that doesn't pay for itself within the lifetime of the turbine. You're always better off just installing more solar and more storage unless you're building a 200m high wind power plant that essentially always generates enough energy for a small city. We opted for a solar solution with about 10 kWh storage and an energy management system that charges the battery during the winter when prices are low (usually at night when the large turbines nearby are running). The turbines can't compete with ordinary energy pricing, they sure as hell can't compete with a system that grabs electricity at its cheapest from the grid. It's just not worth it.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The low wind needed to operate this wind turbine is great for people trying to live off-grid or camping. With stronger winds, the wind turbine can produce more power for your home or trailer. However, the manufacturer recommends not to use this turbine in areas that have turbulent wind conditions often. Source: https://houseandbeyond.org/best-home-wind-turbine

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Which part of Seattle is that 😇

I’m joshin ya! Curious though if there’s evidence parent commenter was wrong

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

So you're revising your position previously stated position that wind is a great solutions for home power then?

[–] knightly@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Lets be generous and assume that the blades of your turbine are 1 square meter.

Looking at the map, we can see that the entire Seattle area has an average ground level wind energy density of maybe 50 watts per square meter.

Assuming that the windmill is twice as efficient as every other windmill and can extract 70% of that wind energy, we can estimate that your windmill will output roughly 35 watts of energy on average, or about 25 kWh per month.

The average American home uses more than 850 kWh per month, so it'd need at least 35 of these twice-as-good-as-normal windmills. A more realistic figure would be "more than 75".

75 * $320 = $24k, more than twice the price of the average solar install in the Seattle area.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Assuming that the windmill is twice as efficient as every other windmill and can extract 70% of that wind energy, we can estimate that your windmill will output roughly 35 watts of energy on average, enough to slow-charge a laptop, for a total of about 25 kWh per month.

And while this hypothetical example gives the best case scenario for home wind provided in our discussion, I can give you the real world data from a residential solar array. I'm one step away from Seattle's solar radiance. I just looked at my home solar data. Last month (March), I generated 36.3kWh from a single 405W rated panel for the month. This is calculated by the total monthly solar power generated divided by the number of panels I have on my roof. I can also tell you March is not a good month for solar in my northern state. During my best month (June) last year I generated 59kWh from the same single 405w rated panel.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ahh I get it now. You have no idea what you're talking about. You have the smallest understanding of something and assume that is everything. You're so very far away from understanding the practical applications and limits. You're also clearly not interested in learning, so I'll leave you to your impractical delusions.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Wait so the same people that can't drop 500 USD for an emergency are expected to drop 300 USD for a wind turbine and provide the installation of it to boot is that right