Solar Energy

85 readers
6 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

I asked Claude 4 opus (thinking) re sunlight hitting a solar cell. Per Claude, the infrared wavelengths near the visible light wavelengths are the most efficient. But a big part of the sunlight is visible light, so a big part of the electrical energy from a solar cell is from visible light.

Also, per Claude, "When light strikes an n-type monocrystalline silicon solar cell, photons must have sufficient energy to promote electrons from the valence band to the conduction band across silicon's bandgap. Silicon has a bandgap energy of approximately 1.12 electron volts (eV) at room temperature, which corresponds to a wavelength of about 1107 nanometers. This means photons with wavelengths longer than 1107 nm (energy less than 1.12 eV) cannot generate electron-hole pairs in silicon and pass through the material without contributing to electrical current. The relationship between photon energy and wavelength follows the equation E = hc/λ, where E is energy, h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, and λ is wavelength. Using this relationship, we can understand how different portions of the solar spectrum interact with silicon. Infrared radiation spans wavelengths from about 700 nm to 1 mm, with energies ranging from approximately 1.77 eV down to 0.001 eV. Only the near-infrared portion up to about 1107 nm can be absorbed by silicon. Photons in the 700-1107 nm range have energies between 1.77 and 1.12 eV, making them ideal for silicon solar cells as they have just enough energy to create electron-hole pairs with minimal excess energy lost as heat. Visible light extends from 400 to 700 nm, corresponding to energies of 3.1 to 1.77 eV. All visible photons have more than enough energy to overcome silicon's bandgap. However, the excess energy above 1.12 eV is largely wasted through thermalization, where hot carriers quickly lose their extra energy as heat. This fundamental thermalization loss limits the theoretical efficiency of single-junction silicon cells. Ultraviolet light, with wavelengths below 400 nm, carries energies above 3.1 eV. While UV photons are readily absorbed by silicon, their high excess energy results in significant thermalization losses. Additionally, UV photons are often absorbed very near the surface of the cell, where recombination rates are typically higher, further reducing their contribution to the cell's output current. The high surface recombination and thermalization losses make UV photons particularly inefficient for silicon solar cells despite their high energy."

I know re llm hallucination so I googled. I verified the energy formula and silicon's energy gap.

Has Claude been right?

2
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/40034096

Chinese producers of polysilicon, a building block for solar panels, are in talks to create a 50 billion yuan ($7 billion) fund to acquire and shut down roughly a third of production capacity and restructure part of the loss-making sector, GCL Technology Holdings said.

The top polysilicon producer told Reuters on Thursday plans were being discussed to acquire and shut at least 1 million metric tons of lower-quality polysilicon capacity.

"It is sort of like the OPEC of the polysilicon industry, wherein total supply for a specified timeframe has to be agreed by the central committee and production quotas to be allocated to producers," GCL's investor relations director Jun Zhu said.

The plan is one of the strongest signals yet that the heightened rhetoric against overcapacity rolled out by the Chinese government this month is translating into action. Chinese industries, from solar to electric vehicles, are grappling with massive overcapacity and vicious price wars that are wiping out profits.

[...]

3
1
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by AA5B@lemmy.world to c/solarenergy@lemmy.world
 
 

Is this a good place to ask about home solar installation experiences? I don’t see a community description.

For people who have done it, what are the little things that surprised you either way?

In the US we’re phasing out the tax incentive for installing home solar installation experiences, so I’m considering getting it done asap while it’s still available. But I have questions like

  • are there things I need to ask for or about?
  • what happens when my roof needs repair or replacement? Is it expensive? What if the installer is no longer in business at that point?
  • installers offer warrantees but what if they’re no longer in business 25 years from now? Would they be honored by manufacturers?
  • my first quote claims 7 year payback. Is that believable or should I assume marketing BS? (When I first looked years ago I decided 7 was a good number if believable, but 12 years would be too long)
  • my first quote offers an ‘Enphase’ microinverter. Home Assistant (home automation hub) has an integration, assuming there is an “Enphase Envoy” communications gateway and “grid consumption meter” but the quote doesn’t have that level of detail. Are those expected? Do I need to ask for them?
  • my first quote talks about remote monitoring - are they going to charge me a subscription? Will everything work without a subscription? Will it continue working if the installer goes out of business?

Edit to add

  • they quoted half my expected usage based on actual from the last year. Is this normal or likely because I have limited unshaded roof?
  • my current electric bill is about half “generation” and half “delivery”. Obviously solar will reduce my “generation” charge. However without batteries, am I likely to still owe “delivery” on my own electricity?
  • my area has net usage metering, which is great, but do they true up monthly or annually? If I generate more than I use in a month, am I wasting money, or will that help the next month? (I currently have gas heat so very electric low usage in winter)
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20