British Films

366 readers
1 users here now

For all your British move-going needs as well as news about the British film industry.

Communities

Elsewhere in the Fediverse

Chat

Matrix

Rules:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/45096275

March 24, 2026

In the shadow of an imperial hegemon and with severe restrictions on its ability to trade and access resources, Cuba may appear as an enigma to audiences curious about the type of cinema that has emerged from such conditions.

The Cuban revolution of 1959 caused a radical break in the development of the country’s cinema. Film-making existed before “this moment of effervescence” but was historically an imitation of Hollywood-style film-making, according to Jessica Gordon-Burroughs, a lecturer in Latin American studies at the University of Edinburgh. In contrast, the first decade after the revolution heralded “a very exciting and innovative time, both politically and aesthetically in Cuba”.

2
3
 
 

This brings us to Bond jokes. Starting with Sean Connery's Bond in 1962, the suave secret agent often accompanied his punches with a punny punchline. In Goldfinger (1964), after electrocuting a would-be assassin in a bathtub, Bond says, "Shocking. Positively shocking." And now, according to some rumors, the next round of James Bond films will bring back these puns in a big way. But, honestly, have they ever really left?

According to a lengthy report in The Times, and reported by other outlets like MovieWeb, insiders suggest that the next installment in the franchise will "return to a Bond of quips and camp, a shift away from the Shakespearean heft of Craig. More traditional yet easier to sell via memes to Amazon’s younger demographic."

MovieWeb notes that this news "is sure to send a shiver down the spines of many a Bond fan." While Screenrant declares that this move would "would be a mistake." While there is some truth that the Daniel Craig era, beginning in 2006 with Casino Royale, was a fresh start, it's not that James Bond should be taken too seriously in general. Even the Ian Fleming novels have a certain flair for self-parody. In 1961, Bond can be found making jokes in pages of Thunderball, saying: "I'm the world's authority on giving up smoking. I do it constantly." Even the somber Daniel Craig swansong, No Time To Die, had Bond making a joke about an exploding electronic eyeball, telling Q that his watch, which caused the explosion, "really blew their mind."

...

Plus, there's nothing wrong with Bond rebooting with a slightly more lighthearted feeling. Most agree that in 1995, Pierce Brosnan's first outing as 007 basically saved the franchise with GoldeneEye. But, this film was decidedly funnier than its 1989 predecessor, Timothy Dalton's brooding second mission in Licence to Kill. In GoldenEye, Bond is joking around constantly, noting that Xenia Onatopp (Famke Janssen) "always did enjoy a good squeeze." This is funny because she kills people with her thighs. Get it?

If GoldenEye or Goldfinger or Live and Let Die are somehow lesser Bond movies because they're not as serious as some of the Craig films, then it seems like we'd have to get rid of more than half the Bond canon. If EON and Amazon are really conspiring to make future James Bond movies funnier, then all they're really doing is returning to a formula that already works. Like a silver DB5 or a vodka martini, shaken, not stirred, there's nothing more classically James Bond than a bunch of silly jokes.

4
 
 

In 1953, the BBC aired a science-fiction serial that entranced the nation of Britain. It was the first of its kind, and it was such a raging success that an enterprising movie producer quickly snapped up the rights to turn the story into a feature film. Two years later, that movie raked in money at the UK box office and, in the process, helped give an identity to one of the most iconic movie studios the British Isles has ever seen. Even more impressively, the film crossed the water to the US, becoming Britain’s most influential sci-fi film ever.

When the BBC’s Head of Television Drama, Michael Barry, looked at the schedule for summer 1953, he saw something he didn’t like: nothing. A gap of six Saturday nights in a row needed to be filled with a serial, so he tasked one of the company’s screenwriters with filling that gap. Nigel Kneale had always been fascinated by the idea of science going wrong, so he wrote The Quatermass Experiment, the tale of the fictional British Experimental Rocket Group’s first manned flight into outer space. Two crew members are missing when the craft returns to Earth, and the third begins transforming into a terrifying alien creature. Professor Bernard Quatermass and Scotland Yard Inspector Lomax are forced to team up to prevent the mutated crewman from destroying the world.

Quatermass was the BBC’s first adult science-fiction drama, performed live at the Alexandra Palace studio in London. By the time the sixth and final episode aired, nearly five million people were watching. To put that into context, only a year before Quatermass, the entire television audience in the UK was four million, and in March 1953, it was estimated that the BBC’s average evening audience was 2.25m. By anyone’s standards, Quatermass was a phenomenon.

One of the five million Quatermass viewers was Hammer Films producer Anthony Hinds, who immediately knew the story would make a great film. He contacted the BBC only two days after the finale aired to ask about the status of the rights. As Kneale was a BBC employee, he didn’t receive a fee for the rights being sold to Hammer for a £500 advance, and this would stick in his craw until the company begrudgingly paid him £3,000 in 1967 to officially recognise his creation of Quatermass.

...

Once again, Quatermass was a roaring success in the UK, this time at the box office. Interestingly, though, when it was shown in the US, it had another title change. The Creeping Unknown was shown as the second part of a double bill with the Gothic horror movie The Black Sheep and was so popular that United Artists immediately commissioned a sequel. Two years later, Quatermass 2 hit cinema screens, again produced by Hammer and directed by Val Guest, before Quatermass and the Pit followed in 1967.

The success of its Quatermass films helped cement Hammer’s reputation as a producer of horror movies, and the studio is still synonymous with that genre today. The films also reached a much wider audience than the BBC’s serial. Kneale’s biographer Andy Murray noted that several generations of sci-fi and horror creatives have spoken in glowing terms about Quatermass’s influence on them.

5
 
 

Part of the enduring appeal of Wallace & Gromit is its British charm. The quaint mannerisms of the hapless inventor and his canine pal–from their love of a cup of tea to their knowing colloquialisms–reflect an admiral sense of national pride, both at home and abroad. But while that British-ness is part of the appeal, it doesn’t defend Aardman from being able to get in jokes that might be a little too close to home.

Now that the latest entry in the series, Vengeance Most Fowl, is making its way around the world in January thanks to Netflix, some of the creatives behind the film revealed at recent press conference for the film that they did have to make some acquiescence to notes from the streamer on a joke that wasn’t going to play well outside of the UK.

“There’s some actually that we’ve had to sort of take out, because just in terms of the Britishness of the film and the sort of cultural references, there’s certain things that don’t travel,” Vengeance Most Fowl executive producer Carla Shelley said. “I remember we had a sort of gag about a bog chain at one point… for anybody that doesn’t out there, that’s like a toilet flush. We were talking to Netflix and [the note back] was like ‘what’s a bog chain!?’ There are certain sorts of references that we might pull back on now.

6
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/16564038

A karmic journey that sees the hapless heroine Agnes (Alice Lowe) reincarnated every time she makes the same mistake: falling in love with the wrong man.

https://www.themoviedb.org/movie/706693-timestalker

7
 
 

Seven years ago, Alice Lowe released her debut movie Prevenge, which she filmed while pregnant. It followed a pregnant widow who was convinced her unborn child was compelling her to go on a killing spree.

It was every bit as brilliant as that unique concept promised (it's available to watch on Prime Video if you haven't seen it), leaving us desperate to see what Lowe would do next. We've had to wait a while, but fortunately, Timestalker has been worth it.

The historical sci-fi rom-com – which held its UK premiere at the Edinburgh International Film Festival – is another inventive and unique offering from Lowe, confirming her as one of the UK's most exciting filmmakers.

...

If you're familiar with Lowe's previous written work, Timestalker's dark vein of humour won't surprise you, but otherwise, be prepared. It might be romantic and also a comedy, but a fluffy rom-com it isn't. There's a winning blend of deadpan humour, very silly (and very British) gags and pitch-black, gory laughs.

...

Timestalker is the most unique British movie of the year, and it's also among the best British movies of 2024 to date. Let's hope Alice Lowe doesn't leave us waiting seven years again for her next movie.

8
 
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/3800489

Hammer Horror returns with a genderflipped take on Robert Louis Stevenson's iconic novel, starring Eddie Izzard as a leading figure of the pharmaceutical industry with a dark secret.

In a delicious example of nominative determinism, British horror powerhouse Hammer Film Productions was recently acquired by theatre producer John Gore. He will oversee a revival of schlocky, low-budget British horror – starting with a new adaptation of Robert Louis Stevenson’s 1886 Gothic novella Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. It is well-worn territory for the studio, including Hammer staple Terence Fisher’s The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll (1960), and Dr. Jekyll and Sister Hyde (1971) directed by Roy Ward Baker.

The latter version rode on a wave of gender-swapped horror remakes, playing to the suspense potential of an oh-so-innocent female secretly veiling the monster inside. As with bigger-budget horror movies from Hitchcock’s Psycho to De Palma’s Dressed to Kill, Dr. Jekyll and Sister Hyde played to the most terrifying trope of all – the man whose alter-ego is a woman. It’s important to have all of this in mind when watching Joe Stephenson’s Doctor Jekyll, which goes one step further than previous iterations by changing the genders of both Jekyll and Hyde, now Nina and Rachel.

...

Doctor Jekyll revives a missing element of British cinema – you can see the walls shaking, the cheapness of the props, the hamminess of the acting. But that’s what Hammer is all about, the sort of horror that has you laughing one minute and throwing your popcorn in the air in fright the next. Izzard also subverts the fear of gender that has long haunted horror cinema by both playing to and away from the ongoing ‘trans scare’. It looks like Hammer has returned from the dead.