this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
231 points (98.3% liked)

World News

56937 readers
1941 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to him, the country’s economy “hit rock bottom” in the first quarter, which could lead to a crisis.

Zyuganov also suggested that the situation this fall could resemble the events of 1917, when the communists came to power.

Video with English subtitles available here: https://bsky.app/profile/antongerashchenko.bsky.social/post/3mk3d7tu6m22v

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 89 points 2 months ago (4 children)

A communist coup in Moscow would be a bit on the nose, but I’d allow it

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ill pencil it in for early October

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Julian or Gregorian calendar? I want to get this right this time

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Let's go with Julian, and if not enough people show up that day we'll go Full Greg.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] West_of_West@piefed.social 15 points 2 months ago

It's not like last time where the Russian empire is caught up in a war of attrition in Eastern Europe... oh wait.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 65 points 2 months ago (32 children)

"He emphasized that such a scenario must not be allowed to happen."

Controlled opposition.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

leader of a communist party warns against starting a communist revolution

mrw

[–] mech@feddit.org 21 points 2 months ago

Sounds to me more like a nudge nudge, wink wink sentence to avoid 25 years of prison in Siberia.

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 36 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Maybe, but I don't think that the conditions are nearly as bad as they were in 1917. They're obviously worse than they would have been had Russia not entered into the war, but the collapse in 1917 was due to urban food shortages. I don't mean "luxury X is unavailable", but that people couldn't get staple food to survive because of demands of the war.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/russias-february-revolution-was-led-women-march-180962218/

Like the French Revolution in 1789, a bread shortage in the capital precipitated unrest. After long shifts in the factories, female factory workers stood in bread lines alongside other women including domestic servants, housewives and soldiers’ widows. In these bread lines, news and rumors about planned rationing spread. When Saint Petersburg municipal authorities announced on March 4 that rationing would begin ten days later, there was widespread panic; bakeries were sacked, their windows broken and supplies stolen.

As he had throughout the previous months, Nicholas once again underestimated the extent of the unrest and again departed for military headquarters more than 400 miles away in Mogliev, which is now in Belarus, against the advice of his ministers. In the czar’s mind, leadership of the military took precedence during wartime, and he was concerned by the mass desertions occurring in the aftermath of munitions shortages and defeats at the hands of the Germans.

Though in past moments of revolutionary sentiment, the military had stood by its czar, by 1917, the armed force was demoralized and sympathetic to the demonstrators’ cause. The presence of large groups of women among the demonstrators made soldiers particularly reluctant to fire on the crowds. When the soldiers joined the demonstrators, as opposed to firing upon them, the end of the Romanov dynasty was near.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/ztyk87h/revision/5

There was a severe lack of food in Moscow and, in 1917, Petrograd only received half of the grain required to feed its citizens.

Now, okay. It's possible that standards for political support are different, that the bar has changed. But the public in Russia of 2026


though it may be in a worse state than Russia of 2020 due to resources consumed by the war


is also not experiencing the degree of deprivation of Russia of 1917.

[–] ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That is definitely true, but 21st century examples of revolution don't necessarily need a food shortage to begin (Maidan, Nepal, etc.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] egyto@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

This is consistently true of most revolutions. Once a lot of people are staring at the possibility of starvation you hit critical mass on people with nothing to lose.

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

It’s true. Looking back on revolutions, starvation is a common cause. What we haven’t seen is a relatively better off population revolt because their conditions got notably worse, from pretty good to pretty bad but not close to starvation.

[–] TimeNaan@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that party in Russia super pro-government? Essentially controlled oposition?

[–] Butterphinger@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 months ago

New boss is the old boss.

"we won the revolution!

now get back to work!"

[–] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Warns of the Risk of a Revolution in Russia

Isn't it, like, his job to make this happen?

[–] egyto@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

I'm pretty sure any real communists in Russia would be brutally repressed.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh, soviet union 2. Now with more soviets.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Soviet Union 2: Electric Bogaloo.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Janx@piefed.social 5 points 2 months ago

Oops! All Commies

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

God damn, that was a good one!!

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It'd be nice is Russia can take back itself from that dick-tater... Get rid of all of Putin's ilk, elect a decent person as president., power wash the stench away, peace talks with their neighbors, condemnation of the US Pedo Party. All that good stuff.

Highly doubt it will happen.

Damn, I want that for the US!

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Take it back to what, though? The 1990s? I guess that’d be an improvement. What they really need is progress. Is there any kind of progressive movement in Russia?

[–] leriotdelac@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

There was, but it was all stomped in the very beginning.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

It would not be an improvement - do you have any idea how bad the 1990s were in Russia?

There's a reason that Putin has high support, and it's not all manufactured. It's that the Yeltsin shock therapy was really traumatic - largest peacetime drop in life expectancy in recorded history.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Simpsons did it

[–] sinnsykfinbart@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Russian jokes still write themselves

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 months ago

In Soviet Russia, joke writes you!

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago

Oh well. As a certain ballistic missile submarine Captain once observed: A revolution every now and again, is a healthy thing.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Good wipe Putin off the map

[–] voaw@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

We’re gonna see that in the US before we see it in Russia. At least Russians have free education and free healthcare mandated by their constitution.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I support it. I have no love for the early USSR, but I see its fall as a historical tragedy

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Communism sucks but even that would be better than Putin.

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

All communism?

Soviet communism was a disaster. Chinese communism works but is authoritarian. Israeli kibbutzes are pretty-much communism.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

Ya forgot about Yugoslavias mixed system which also worked pretty well.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

All communism?

Yeah, seems so.

Chinese communism works but is authoritarian.

From the POV of a communist I'm sure there's a lot more in chinese communism to critique than just the authoritarianism. Like the existence of a billionaire class, private ownership of means of production, lack of independent labor unions, pretty high income inequality, market economy, and pretty western-looking consumerism. I mean it's pretty much like USA if USA only had one political party.

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

I'm not advocating for the Chinese approach or for communism at all. My point about China is that it has improved living standards (pretty spectacularly) while others have failed.

If I could choose anything it would be like scandi-social-democracy, but with stronger controls on corporate and personal greed. I'd make hoarding wealth while others suffer socially unnaceptable.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

"Socialism with Chinese characteristics" is just capitalism with extra steps and a red paint job.

If you're talking about the Mao Zedong era, that was also a disaster but at least they did try to run the country according to communist principles. They were just very bad at it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›