this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2026
382 points (99.2% liked)

Mildly Interesting

27379 readers
169 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit:
Just realized the correct name for the tree is actually maple.

False friend caused mistake because its name is "Ahorn" in German.
Keeping the heading as it is, because it is funny, although it might trigger the Canadians (sorry, dudes!).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

And those 'blossom-thingies' are called ... flowers.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Does the term "flower" apply to trees, though?

Besides, the dropped stuff seemed only to be a part of the blossoms that I didn't knew the name for.
Rest of the blossom constructs stayed on the tree.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Does the term “flower” apply to trees, though?

Yes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flowering_plant

Besides, the dropped stuff seemed only to be a part of the blossoms that I didn’t knew the name for.

Flower petals.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Thanks!

So, TIL that the English term "flower" is used in a much broader sense than its supposed direct German translation "Blume".

Nobody in Germany would say a tree has flowers (Blumen), but that it has blossoms (Blüten).
And "Flowering Plants" are also named "Blütenpflanzen" ("Blossom Plants").

So saying "tree flowers" sounds really, really odd to me.
Like someone calling a jumping frog "a flying frog".

So thanks for the explanation, would never have guessed that by myself but will now use it in all my future tree-related discussions! :-)

[–] protist@retrofed.com 14 points 3 months ago

In English, in my opinion at least, "flower" describes the inflorescence at any point in its growth cycle, while "blossom" describes the flower at its fullest development. More often though, "blossom" is used as a verb meaning to bloom or to develop.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"Blossom" essentially means "flower". It's just not used as often. At least not in American English.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I knew it from things like "cherry blossom", meaning "Kirschblüte", so have always assumed "blossom" to be used in completely the same way as "Blüte".
Same for "Blume"/"flower".
Turns out, both assumptions have been wrong.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well since it's english and we borrow and mash everything around and together: we say that flowers and trees 'bloom' when they produce blossoms.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago

And as "Blume" is pronounced almost identical to "bloom" (only a tiny addon sound at the ending), we have yet another promising false-friend-candidate! :-)

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

"Blossom" is definitely commonly used in American English, just not nearly as frequently as "flower".

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I usually say ‘blossoms’ for trees though it can sometimes imply blossoming IE new flowers in English

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But your username also gives me slight vibes you might have some affiliation with the German language... ;-)

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Ha well German is my second language

[–] Drusas@fedia.io -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Maple trees do not produce flowers, but many other types of trees do.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maple trees are angiosperms and definitely produce flowers. They may not be showy, but they're there

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Interesting, thank you. I guess I should instead say, then, that I have never seen any flowers on any maple trees and I have seen tons of maple trees. But I didn't know that. I'll have to do some reading. I love plants. You could study them all day every day and die knowing so little about them.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Quite a few angiosperms have inconspicuous flowers. All grasses have flowers, but on most species you'll never see them unless you're studying them with a magnifying glass

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago

You really can spend so much of your time learning about plants and barely ever know anything about them.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maple trees do not produce flowers

But according to Wikipedia, they do?

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wow, I'll have to look out up. None of the maples in my region do.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago

Perhaps they have not been through puberty yet... ;-)