this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
116 points (99.2% liked)
Linux
13230 readers
264 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Most servers are most likely on LTS distros and won’t be affected by this bug.
Interestingly it seems the first rule of kernel development, we don’t break user space should apply here.
That's the thing. It doesn't break it to the point of unusable unlike other patches I think. So the test didn't catch this since performance is rarely a part of a test suite no?
I'm not a kernel developer, but it does seem weird to remove the legacy function in the same patch as the replacement function is shipped.
That said, isn't it fairly easy to install a modified kernel? Or is that hard on Ubuntu for some reason? I suppose it's to do with official support cycles and patches, so that's only really a viable fix if the distro manages to kernel options, to ensure timelines with security patches and commercial support.
yeah i'm running a lts distro but keep the kernel up to date, it's super simple, there's even gui apps for it