this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
143 points (100.0% liked)

World News

40320 readers
672 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think its kind of dumb because the P-47 Thunderbolt was a high altitude interceptor/fighter that also happened to be good at ground pounding.

The A-10 is exclusively a ground pounder that becomes a sitting duck if it ever gets caught with its pants down.

Dunno why they copted a fighter name.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A-10 is live target practice for Iran's domestically produced manpads. It should not be anywhere near this conflict. That they are using it at all shows massive incompetence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misagh-2

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 weeks ago

The whole reason why there isn't a modern equivalent to the A-10 is because the Air Force knew that said plane wouldn't be able to survive in a conflict where the enemy had any surface-to-air attack capability.