this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
16 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

7823 readers
15 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It is worth noting that the benchmarked Snapdragon X2 Plus ran on a reference platform, while testers used commercially available products for the other chips. This is a key caveat, as results can vary widely depending on chip binning, cooling, power limits, SSD speed, memory latency, and installed apps.

What this means is that performance with real devices will likely be even worse.

With the X Elite we also had benchmark results on "reference platforms" that were never hit on real devices.

[โ€“] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Hardware vendors also tweak the software stacks on their reference platforms to cheat at benchmarks. I once caught some Intel "improvements" to the Android Java implementation that broke thread safety in a number of regex functions which had been driving some of our app devs nuts.