Ouep mais ce sont des lycéens qui ne connaissent pas tous les dangers liés aux numériques et l'importance de garder un certain anonymat.
Je trouve que c'est une attaque directe envers nos libertés et que le maire et personne qui l'a invité, ainsi que la police devrait etre condamné.
Manifester est un droit, l'Etat doit l'encourager, pas le restreindre. Perso, je saisirai la justice.
That's a good start but i'm worried that most of us are lazy. They won't change their habits unless you enforce it.
I wouldn't condemn AI in this case. For example most of captioned video come from AI. Yes there is typo, lenghty text, missing text, nonsensical text but they do a fairly good job. No one have the time to create subtitle, and engaging professional may be costly.
Without AI, i wouldn't be able to watch and understand videos, podcasts nor get a transcript.
Adding posts with no alt text to a predefined category or tag (such as Mastodon’s #Alt4Me) sounds like a reasonable alternative.
Yes you are right. :)
No CCP style shit please, we already have enough of that with Piefed
I don't see why we should support content without alt text. There is people with various disability
I'm offering to void the post visibility :
I'm deaf and i think we should all do an effort to make the web accessible. Everyday, i have to adapt to your world.
People can give a small fraction of their time to improve accessibility. But you are right it maybe too harsh, we should find a middle ground that invite users making the web a place place rather them punishing them.
Long explaination on piefed score
There is pro and cons using lemmy or piefed. Both have a different stance on moderation and offer a different experience.
Lemmy doesn't check downvote or users with bad reputation. How are you able to act with toxic users ? For example one downvoting a lot and the other one that post terrible thing thus get lot downvote ? Is this good for your community ? I don't think you will enjoy interacting with them.
Piefed score was requested by most admins and mods. It help us creating good community, our main job is creating a place where people enjoy sharing their experience. There are 2 scores :
So it just give us a general idea on users and improve community ambiance.
Futhermore, you can't just take the scoring system alone. Those features work together :
A simple one, i believe that softwares must enforce them rather letting users doing it.
Here is some ideas :
It maybe harsh but i believe that's the only way to reach accessibility.
Edit :
Très sympas ton week-end :3
@troglodyte_mignon@tarte.nuage-libre.fr @professeur_falken@jlai.lu
Trop content, ça s'est bien passé, on a eu de super retours et des conseils pour améliorer notre conférence :3
🦆🦆 ! Bref premier exam gros LSF, conference 1h sur le spectacle vivant piSourd. (Yep ct le sondage que je vous ais partagé ici) :3
Tremplin dans le sens où iels boostent, federent, facilitent la formation de groupe vers d'autres ideologies reactionnaire.
(Pour pas vous reveiller de si beau matin)
Well that's what i did on lemmy in the begginning.
So a middle ground is need or maybe we should work on a fediverse accessibility charter ? Something that set some rules for the whole fediverse :