Self Hosted - Self-hosting your services.

20717 readers

2 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules

No harassment
crossposts from c/Open Source & c/docker & related may be allowed, depending on context
Video Promoting is allowed if is within the topic.
No spamming.
Stay friendly.
Follow the lemmy.ml instance rules.
Tag your post. (Read under)

Important

Lemmy doesn't have tags yet, so mark it with [Question], [Help], [Project], [Other], [Promoting] or other you may think is appropriate. This is strongly encouraged!

Cross-posting

!everything_git@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!docker@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!portainer@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!fediverse@lemmy.ml is allowed if topic has to do with selfhosting.
!selfhosted@lemmy.ml is allowed!

If you see a rule-breaker please DM the mods!

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

dogmuffins@lemmy.ml

Zoe8338@lemmy.ml

testman@lemmy.ml

Running docker compose the right way (lemmy.ml)

submitted 8 months ago by trilobite@lemmy.ml to c/selfhost@lemmy.ml

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm having some problems installing Vaultwarden and I wonder if it because I'm running docker compose in the wrong way and there are user permission issues.

What is the right way of installing docker compose (on a linux VM)? In in the past I would create a docker folder /home/user/docker. In there I would create the folder firefly or whatever and then I would run docker compose as user. So, when installing firefly, I would be in the /home/user/docker/firefly and run docker compose from within. Not as root (using sudo) but as a the normal user user. Firefly service would just run without problmes. Shoudl I be installing containers this way of shoudl I be using root (sudo)?

all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

that is fine, the only requirement AFAIK is the user being in the docker group in case you're having permission issues running it as user

[–] chonkyninja@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Or you know, move on to newer better tools that even docker uses internally instead of this limpdick unsupported tool.

Use kind, and kubernetes resources. You can literally use ‘kompose’ to convert your compose config, and then apply it to a local kind cluster.

[–] bobo_buffington@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago

Since when is docker compose unsupported?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Compose is just a single binary. There is no wrong way to install it really as long as it can find all the needed shared libraries and such.

If in doubt, look at the manual install instructions. Run through that, and see if it behaves any differently.

Some logs from the startup of a this container would help. Just run docker compose up (without the -d) and you'll get all the output up front.