this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
32 points (78.6% liked)

Linux

15178 readers
264 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes, that too.

Incentivizing hiding LLM use would be a problem. Encouraging disclosure is good.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Plus if the general requirement is 'high quality code' then that automatically excludes the majority of LLM usage where people just vibe code it and rely heavily on the LLM to do the work. VS someone writing their own code while using an LLM to help find problems.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well... IMO, there's a whole spectrum between "very rare LLM brianstorming/troubleshooting" and "I don't know how to code" vibe-coding, and Im not sure what the distribution looks like.

Personally, I get LLMs to generate boilerplate, formatting, and functions, but manually write plenty and audit/assemble all the pieces myself.