this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)
GenZedong
5288 readers
10 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm not pro-zohran by any metric really [social democrat, auto dismissed], but I dont really get the criticism of him not arresting netanahyu.
1.Hes a mayor. He can't unilaterally recognize the ICC. And he can't really arrest a foreign head of state, and even then what would the charge be? The only thing would maybe be delivering him to an embassy that recognizes the ICC? Then what? Idk
2.if we push past this and say "oh well ge could just do it anyway," he'd probably be arrested and deposed immediately, and that might be best case scenario. Worst case scenario people start shooting each other when there's no way he or the progressive forces in America would win.
Don't get me wrong, this isn't a defense of anything else. But I just don't get this one bit.
the criticism ive seen more is: he should do policies that he can actually do (eg. ban zionist funding / investment), instead of posturing about policies he cannot do
I do suppose I agree on that though, yeah
Hmmm
I think... Well... No.
I think not everyone has this angle or, at least, it's not the "dominant" angle most people have atm
This is what I hear from Palestinian solidarity orgs
That's fair, I agree with that