this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
103 points (99.0% liked)

World News

58031 readers
777 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Even at a hit rate of one in ten, which is on the lower end of plausible, drones are still very good value. Even if you take ten drones to kill one soldier that is still cheaper than the thousands of rounds of rifle ammo or hundreds of artillery shells it would normally take.

[–] PapstJL4U@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Even with 500 a piece and 1000 drones, they would have 0.5 vs 16

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah - I'm absolutely sure it's still lower-cost in the long run. Also easier to produce "at scale" so the math works in the end.

[–] Glemek@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

And the startup costs are lower, so it works in the beginning too.