To be fair, if you're intentionally only filming one specific person, I'm sure they could claim harassment at some point. Maybe public disturbance or nuisance?
uselessartifact
joined 6 months ago
Speaking as someone from the US, consent is not required to record someone in public.
"There is no responsible expectation of privacy while in public."
If you don't want to be recorded by people at random, stay home.
A glitch launches the patient instead. Possibly has the same results, plus or minus a few extra contusions.
Well, it proves they have shoes. Maybe they have something other than feet in them...bats? hooves?
Well, there are repercussions for us plebs. 'Rules for thee...' and such.
If you're recording while you pee, yes. If you're not recording while you pee, probably still yes.
Well, it wouldn't be a laser, more something like magnetically confined plasma.
I rarely boot Windows anymore but when I do, it's via grub. I haven't had an issue with Windows "repairing" the bootloader and disabling Linux. Anecdotal, to be sure, but it seems to be fine.
I thought conservatives didn't like cancel culture...now he's trying to cancel Europe?
Taken from the what you'll learn in this article section at the top:
- Fossilized footprints in Saudi Arabia show human traffic on the cusp of a subsequent ice age.
- Like carbon dating, scientists use isotopes and context clues to calculate the approximate age of fossils.
- These human prints were surrounded by animals but not hunted animals, indicating humans were just thirsty.
view more: next ›
"Yeah. RISC is good"