shortwavesurfer

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

Oneplus nord n200 the device was released in 2021, but I purchased it brand new in the box in 2023. So I've had it for three years, although it's a five-year-old device.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 4 points 18 hours ago

That idea of a 5% discount doesn't sound like such a bad idea.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 3 points 21 hours ago

Something tells me the article doesn't understand the way Bitcoin works. A transaction takes 10 minutes to clear on-chain, unless you're using the lightning network, and the lightning network is fucking terrible, especially for high-value transactions like this. Because you can be rug-pulled. That and you can't send high-value transactions on a lightning network because every link in the chain has to have the proper amount of liquidity to make that transaction occur.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

True, a place like Iran could keep it untraceable, although they would have to take some extra care in order to do so. But for your average person that's not being looked at by a nation state, it is much easier to remain untraceable.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh, if they demanded Monero, people would figure out how to get it.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 60 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Honestly, the biggest mistake they've made here is that they're not demanding Monero instead.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It takes 10 minutes to get a single confirmation, but I'm assuming that it takes more than 10 minutes for a ship to transit this waterway, so it wouldn't matter.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago

Correct. Monero would be untraceable.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Well, thankfully, since on peer tube, your video is shared between all the peers currently watching. If your video gets super popular, your connection isn't actually hammered all that badly due to the fact that other peers are also supplying bits of the video for people.

As for the storage though, that's a very good point.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago (6 children)

PeerTube has entered the chat

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 days ago

Yeah, it's pretty well hidden. I wasn't aware of it for the longest time either, and just happened to stumble across it myself.

 

Scenario: I have an automation called John's AC. John's AC has four separate triggers. Max, minimum lower temperature, lower temperature, upper temperature, and max upper temperature. If the room temperature is below max lower temperature or lower temperature and it warms up to either of those two triggers, the automation gets triggered and creates a log event.

Question: Is there some way to make triggers enable and disable other triggers in their conditions? What I was thinking about doing is having upper temperature and max upper temperature be the only two active triggers. If either was hit, John's AC would then turn on and the triggers for lower temperature and max lower temperature would be enabled until one of those two triggers was hit, at which point John's AC would turn off, and those two triggers would be disabled. until upper temperature got hit again.

Admittedly, it's a lot of work, just to avoid a couple of log messages, but just for shits and giggles, I wonder if it's possible.

 

meshtastic already has one, but Meshcore didnt until now.

Link to join the group Meshcore: https://smp4.simplex.im/g#AW5gWzrlNydKCf0QgvxyOC_HNnJufRxn9ZQEpyP0Zlc

view more: next ›