darkevilmac

joined 3 years ago
[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 hours ago (8 children)

Counterpoint: GIFs loop by default in basically every app, WEBM doesn't

[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 hours ago

Oil pan full of sludge, presumably because so much of the motor oil has burned off

[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

I like this article downplaying the model by saying this is only a "mini deepseek moment in a developer centric sense" - as if developers aren't the main profitable use case for LLMs and the ones responsible for the model selection in products that reach end users

If the model is good enough for a developer and the cost is right, then that's the model that you're going to be using whether you notice or not.

11
drool (lemmy.zip)
[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

I've used local models and they just tend to screw up more often in my experience. But I'm also more focused on having agents do long running tasks which small models just aren't good at.

[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Well then Alibaba needs to get better at it cause the Qwen models have kinda sucked in my experience.

[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

The reason things haven't fallen apart is because there's a lot of devs working a lot more than they used to making sure they're patching vulnerabilities. Last year if you asked me what portion of my time was spent updating dependencies and responding to reports of vulnerabilities I'd say like 5-10%, this year that's easily more like 30%

I'm sure not every company is doing this, but depending on the sensitivity of the data the company is holding I'd imagine you'd see similar patterns elsewhere

52
rule (lemmy.zip)
[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm more of a Petro Canada fella

[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't see this ending up as anything other than the companies effected increasing their prices to cover themselves (and then some) and then the adjusted revenue being taken as a tax and passed directly to the media industry. We're just funnelling money to executives that will lobby for more money to be funnelled to them instead of them actually making a product that people want to use

[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

There was a picture a few years back with the chair of the CRTC out for beers with the CEO of Bell - there's just no chance in hell this money is going to actual people without getting really heavily skimmed by those execs.

[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

This is just corporate welfare for our media corporations. If you think this is going to do anything other than just end up flowing up to the executives of Bell, Rogers, and Telus media then you are mistaken.

[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago

I was too late to make the Lua joke, damn

 

Edmund mcmuffin did it again

 
view more: next ›