ThirdConsul

Yeah, I call bullshit or a case of not appreciating your own culture.

Dutch were the damn spice traders of the world. This can be still seen in many dishes, even damn cookies like hagel.

You have had proper meats, so all meat products were in your cuisine - rook and metworsts. Pancakes with bacon and shit. Tiger bread with spreads.

You eat the damn abomination of a spice liquorice like its good, and you're per capita biggest liquorice consumers.

Regarding sweet desserts, you have had a shitton of different pies and buttercakes, as well as this weird cake sandwitch called tampons or smthing like that.

Stamppot is food for the poorest workers. Like literally Dutch version of, idk, mcdonalds or smiliar. Of course its going to be filling but not fancy. If you eat it daily then damn, I'm sorry for you, grab some pears and red wine and make stoofperen.

You assume correctly.

.net runtime after 10 months of using and measuring where LLMs (including latest Claude models) shine reported a mindboggling success rate peaking at 75% (sic!) for changes of 1-50 LOC size - and it's for an agentic model (so you give it a prompt, context, etc, and it can run the codebase, compile it, add tests, reason, repeat from any step, etc etc).

Except it was clearly bullshit because it didn’t work.

Welcome to the LLMs where everything is hallucinated and correctness doesn't matter.

Is anyone having success with these tools

Define success.

Is there a special way to prompt it?

It gets better the more you use it, you will learn what works for you, and what does not. Right now the hot shit is "autonomous agent swarms" peddled by the token sellers as a way to output correct massive features. Do not touch that for now.

What helps with Claude / llms 101:

• when it tells you something about an API, using a tool or whatever, tell it tool version and order it to give you documentation page proving the solution is possible.

• when it oneshots a working solution you will get a dopamine hit. Be aware of that, as it can be addictive or make you trust it. Do not trust it, it sucks long term.

• it will alwyas default to below average solution. Know where your hotspots are, and be extra judgy there.

• it will get lazy and lie to you, especially with tests

• it will not propose code refactors on its own.

• despite the token peddlers claims, no matter if your using the 1M token context window model, the shit degrades when the context window is over 20k-30k tokens - so switch context windows often for better outcomes, but that means you will be burning more money - which obviously benefits the token peddlers.

• do not trust the hype - so far any and all tall claim of a breakthrough from the token peddlers were a lie (e.g. vibing working os that can run Doom, vibing a next.js 96% replacement in a week, vibing a browser, compiler, vibing a browser jailbreak via Mythos)

Would I get better results during certain hours of the day?

Afaik USA timezone has worse performance.

It's not an option in Search.

Bigos in English is called Hunter's Stew, and you ideally include wild game meat in it.

Besides that, shitton of spices, few other kinds of meat like pork and sausage, shrooms, prunes, cabbage (required) and onions.

And it must stew for at least half a day.

Yo, a Pole here. Can you explain what the commenter misrepresented and what's the reality in Germany? I am curious.

I am assuming that like in the rest of the Europe, everyone gets healthcare and education, and that jobless do get welfare, as well as sick people. I can also see that your senior numbers are growing compared to young, so more of the budgets goes to supplement the pension schemes?

(And I don't think Germany needs skilled/unskilled migrants to fill in open positions, as Germany has what, 3M unemployed people that could be retrained for them)

That's exactly the reasoning EU had when they made it into law :)

In EU they are, why?

My dude. At over 4% market share companies are incentivised to buy out competition and become monopolies because it's more profitable.

No one would be able to scale to serve global demand in any way, shape, or form

Yes. Perfect. Because any and all global companies so far are evil and anti-consumer. Disagree? Name 3.

The problem isn’t market share, it’s enforced market share. Anti-competitive practices. Lobbying. Buying out competition

So yeah, I'm glad we agree, that any company at 4% market share must be stopped from growing, because otherwise all of that happens.

Any business that has over 4% market rate should be forcibly split.

Steam is not FORCED to compete and innovate or go under, they do that at the whim of the owner. Who can change his mind. Or die, and the company will be inherited by whomever and sloppify.

Heck, anyone shilling that Steam is a good guy - ffs, you do not own the games you bought.

(Why 4%? There are some old studies that at 5% it brings more profit to get rid of the competition, below innovations are the way to get the money).

Both IIRC.

The engineering is genuinely impressive.

Where? I think I missed it. Looks like slop to me.