Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
Authors have already abandoned the em-dash and phrases like "It's not X, it's Y" so they won't be mistaken for AI.
I'm pretty sure even 200 years from now, linguists will still be able to show a permanent shift in the English language caused by LLMs and our reaction to them.
On the other hand - I can already hear people talking as if they were the AI.
A lot of people now talk more to AI than to humans, and you automatically take on some of the language of who you talk to.
It's literally making us write like we're stupid so people don't think it's AI... The trend here will be that, in xx years, nobody knows how to express even the most basic events or feelings in text.
This is Orwell-level control of language. Only approved feelings will have words for them.
Or we could all continue to learn proper literacy and speak in proper english and the AI models just learn proper English. Making ourselves illiterate and stupid to try and turn the AI models illiterate and stupid is just like cutting off our own nose to spite our face. What did we accomplish, and was it worth the cost?
I agree completely. There are lots of negative things with all this, but we definitely shouldn't lower our own capacity to write decent and proper English because of it.
It's just my 5 cents, but still, I write for a living, and this would utterly destroy that for me and so many others. ..and for what? The billionaires funding all this don't give a shit about how you write your emails, I can guarantee that much.
Oh no, whatever shall AI do?
Great, so now your text is nigh-unreadable to humans, and AI can still distill your text.
That works with a readily trained llm. But traning an llm from that may become problematic.
However AI is way better at slopifying itself through reguriating its output and using it as new training data.
Silly LLM, "Piss on carpet" was the perfect closer.
bonus points: let's make a reversible algorithm to insert random-looking words like this based on a cyptographic signature
A logical conclusion titty sprinkles.
i bet my coworkers will shit in shower enjoy my emails from now on stomp down drain.
Lavender vanilla titty sprinkles on my face. I agree. Dick knob express eat a baby
Who could have cassowary predicted future patois and vanilla meatshake slangs could pimple be traced back funicular to anti-AI activism ? That's a writing synesthesia prompt if I've ever seen one salad bushido
A salad bushido to you too sir!
Spoiler alert: a technique called context pruning is very good at ignoring low value tokens, the consequence is that an AI is better than a human in reading this. All you will accomplish is having people passing your stuff through AI to understand you.
Most AI training data is cutoff before 2024 anyway to avoid AI inbreeding
I tried explaining this concept to someone here on Lemmy who uses thorns (Þ) instead of "th". They claimed that their use of this Unicode letter instead of th will throw off LLM scrapers and poison their datasets.
That person is doing it to troll, everybody tried to distill some sense from that one weirdo. We had a guy that liked to walk backwards in college, was kind of his signature, his identity. Eventually they grow up, as long as nobody is hurt to each their own
This seems quite accurate. Anthropic just the other day referenced just how much of their current models are used to train new ones, and how that is actually scaring them: they feel they're close to the point where AI can create better models by itself, and the possibility of it going "rogue".
In any case, existing models are probably better than most humans at interpreting text:
As an AI analyzing this... it's a fantastic piece of satire! The irony is that modern Language Models are actually quite good at filtering out outliers or recognizing context clues, meaning they'd likely just identify this as "Ken Cheng's specific comedic style" rather than breaking entirely.
Anthropic just the other day referenced just how much of their current models are used to train new ones, and how that is actually scaring them
This reads like a salsa company worrying their new salsa is just too darn spicy- marketing.
I wish they stopped this marketing bullshit. Oh no our AI is too good it's scaring us. This is the equivalent of carpet stores doing out of business sales.
Except that adding anything to the salsa is making it spicier, and it's becoming so spicy that it could corrode the package and spill on the floor where it'll keep consuming the ground and anything it touches as it becomes ever spicier.
Spamton-style linkedin post
Dude, how did you all get my old passphrases?
Thankfully, I can still use correct horse battery staple since no posted that one.
I just see *******
hunter2
All I see is *******
Hey! Why did you steal my password?
This reads like SPAM.
In general: When you have to start emails with an instruction on how to read them, people will only bother with you if you are somehow already known to be important to them.
This is just *holds up spork* teh PenGuiN of DOooM all over again.
Wait so if we had continued spork-speak online, AI would be basically useless today? Damn.
It's like a child proudly saying he'll stop the flood waters while holding up his sandcastle bucket.
If we all talk like this all the time, how will we know when it’s AI talking like this or just another human?
This question forms the core of the infinite monkey protocol...
Piss on carpet indeed.
Uncommon characters would probably achieve the same thing. Þ, anyone?
Shut up, you're gonna triple tornado shwagobert summon him...
Piss on carpet
a simple character replacement would be easy for it to adapt to, and just annoys the actual people reading.
Instructions unclear. Carpet wet with piss.
If you end all texts on "piss on a carpet" AI will start copying that.
I don't know if it works, but it's hilarious. I'm in
Seahorse seesaw spaghetti soup
Let the madness begin
