this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
191 points (98.0% liked)

politics

30006 readers
9 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For nearly a decade, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has been engaged in a top-down rebrand meant partly to solidify its focus and bona fides as a Christian religion.

The U.S. Department of Defense, led by conservative evangelical Pete Hegseth, appears unconvinced.

On Friday, spokesperson Sean Parnell confirmed on social media a report that the department had trimmed its list of recognized religious affiliations, used by its chaplains, from more than 200 to 31.

The Latter-day Saint faith was among those to make the cut. But there was a catch.

The list denotes 20 faiths as Christian, including Catholic, Orthodox Christian, Baptist and Jehovah’s Witnesses. Not, however, the Utah-based faith.

Asked by The Salt Lake Tribune if this omission was intentional, a member of the department’s press team pointed to the statement posted by Parnell.

The Office of the Secretary of War is announcing a significant change to the Department’s categorization of religious affiliation. In a long overdue move, we reduced the list from over 200 unmanageable categories to 31. With this move, we are returning to the original intent of… https://t.co/dgHX5ytzjJ pic.twitter.com/eho537O08J — Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellASW) June 5, 2026

“This decrease in religious affiliation codes is not designed to make any claims on the legitimacy of any faith or religious belief, nor is it intended to provide a list of ‘officially approved’ religions,” he wrote. “Rather, it is designed to allow chaplains to quickly look at the religious composition of their units and determine how they structure resources to best provide for warfighters of all faith groups.”

However, an accompanying video by Hegseth seemed to suggest the change wasn’t entirely one of streamlining bureaucracy.

“In previous administrations, our Chaplain Corps was infected by political correctness and secular humanism,” he said. “...Faith and virtue were traded for self-help and self-care. We started correcting that drift [in December], and today we’re going further.”

Asked if the church planned to respond, a spokesperson for the faith pointed to the FAQ portion of its website. It reads: “Latter-day Saints believe God sent his son, Jesus Christ, to save all mankind from death and their individual sins. Jesus Christ is central to the lives of church members.”

Utah Sens. Mike Lee and John Curtis, both members of the church, took to social media Saturday to condemn the seeming snub, with Curtis stating he is “working now to ensure a correction is made.”

Among those eliminated were Unitarian Universalists, various Wiccans, deists, atheists and others, according to Military.com, the first to report the news.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

The government recognizing some religions and not others is contrary to the founding principles. Too bad the Supreme Court is corrupted by all those Opus Dei reactionaries, otherwise the regulation would be thrown out immediately as unconstitutional.

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 58 points 2 days ago

Ah yeah, every conservative minority ever. “But we were on your team guys!?”

[–] InfernoWarrior@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

If you believe Yeshua is the 'Son of God' and died for our sins, you are a Christian. It is that simple. Nobody else other than Christians believe it. Mormons believe it. They are Christian.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

We are at the stage where the ingroup is restricting. Cool.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I love this.

You might be asking why? Every Mormon I know is a staunch Trump supporter. The fact that it's coming back on them so quickly is just chef's kiss.

Half the Mormons I know hate his guts. But that's sample size and social bias, probably. The only Mormons I willingly still associate with hate the dude's fucking guts.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago

My sister converter to the faith in like 2007, I think? She was always a-political, like to the point of not really having paid attention whatsoever from my understanding (we did not grow up together). While she is still a member officially, and religiously believes, she has left the state of Utah, left the church, no longer attends, and her and her husband don't really associate with any other mormons after 2016. The hatefulness of Trump being supported by her community really upset her and she had to leave. The final nail in the coffin, the thing that spurred her to get genuinely politically active, was Israel/Gaza. Now I don't think the church would take her back if she begged. Not that she would. Lol

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Among those eliminated were Unitarian Universalists, various Wiccans, deists, atheists and others, according to Military.com, the first to report the news.

Weren’t the fuckin’ “Founding Fathers” deists? lol

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That was what jumped out at me too. Yes, they were (depending on the individuals and how you interpret their various letters and essays on the matter) either deists or Unitarians. Thomas Paine wrote the famous deist essay Age of Reason, for example.

Basically “God created us, but has been hands-off ever since. It’s up to us to create a good world where people can exist in harmony, instead of counting on God to do it.”

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (15 children)

Hegseth is a wicked and despicable drunkard, but let's be honest, Mormons were never Christians, and if people started to consider them as such, they might as well consider Muslims and Jews as Christians too. I am more surprised that Jehovah's Witnesses are considered Christians on that list.

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Speaking strictly as an ex-Mormon, I'm going to have to disagree with you there. Personal lived experience, they're definitely Christian. They're also a cult, and the religion is based on a pack of lies, but no bones about it; they do, in fact, believe in Jesus. They put Joseph Smith on the same level as St. Peter, but they don't worship him.

I don't get why people say they aren't Christian. Every time someone tries to explain it to me, it's a wildly different set of guidelines every time.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

I don’t get why people say they aren’t Christian.

The traditional guideline is the Nicene Creed. I dont know if LDSers would sign up to that.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (19 children)

Mormons believe in the divinity of Jesus Christ, that makes them Christian. Sorry that you don't like that, but it is what it is.

[–] spamfajitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This is really the core of it. If someone starts nitpicking over the other details, they've just joined a crowd of ~46,400 other groups all called Christians arguing in a similar way.

Also it's understandable the source would focus on Mormons but I find Unitarian Universalists getting cut way more offensive. They're like the care bears of religion, come on now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"And you get a planet, and you get a planet. But not you, until 1978."

It's fan-fic all the way down.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bro, all of Christianity is a fan-fic.

Jesus never once sought out a literate person to write down his teachings in his lifetime. Everything we know about him was written by his fans quite a while after his death. The New Testament was cobbled together by several different writers and then attributed to the apostles.

If that ain’t fan-fic, I don’t know what is.

Comparatively, Mohammed had three scribes take down his words. If the story of Moses is to be believed, he delivered the Ten Commandments on a stone tablet with his own hands. Joseph Smith wrote the Book of Mormon himself (or translated it himself from golden tablets if you believe that). Aleister Crowley wrote his own holy books and graded them with a system to let readers know which documents were sacred and which ones were commentary. The teachings of Buddha are similar to Jesus in that they were passed down orally for generations before they were written down, but nobody is claiming that those documents were penned by the Buddha or anyone who knew him in his lifetime.

So, as far as claimed prophets go, the story of Jesus is one of the most fan created documents of them all.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Yeah I remember learning about Islam and the story about how it's supposed to be the untranslated word of god, directly from an angel or whatever, rather than just some shit a handful of people wrote 3 decades after it allegedly happened, and thinking that gave them a much firmer claim on the truth.

Of course they're all bullshit, but at least they kind of address that issue in Islam

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

But they also believe that anyone can become a god, which, in the eyes of others, denies the uniqueness of the divinity of Jesus.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's how other denominations define it though. They all fall under the sect of Christianity because they believe in and center their teachings around Jesus. Not because they have other beliefs as well.

Edit:I may have misused denomination and sect but point being there is a larger grouping of "people following Jesus and his teachings central to their religion" And dozens of smaller groupings that go about that process differently.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (22 children)

This is hilarious because when I was unfortunately living there (and generally speaking here, of course), if you called a mormon a christian, it was seen as an insult. At least back then, they typically thought of themselves as better than (with a lot of things, but in this case, better than christians). Now that the christian fascists are in charge of the country, the mormon church suddenly wants in on the grift and they claim that they were always christian.

Also, Mike Lee is a dumbass.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Drusas@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sean Parnell confirmed on social media a report that the department had trimmed its list of recognized religious affiliations, used by its chaplains, from more than 200 to 31.

I'm curious which others were dropped. That's a lot of faiths.

[–] Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 23 hours ago

Wicca at least, obviously a lot more but that was the one I looked for on the new list.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Leopards have a steady diet of faces these days.

I'd feel bad for the Mormons, but they're a bunch of shitheads, like most religious organizations.

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Muslims also believe in Jesus. Does that make them Christian as well?

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, Christ isn't the center of it. Christ to Muslims is like Abraham to Christians in a way. It's not a perfect analogy but gets the gist across.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I think that since they believe Jesus is the gatekeeper to Heaven, they do qualify (according to Jesus).

I understand Christian reluctance to accept Mormons as "neighbors in Christ", as it is a more modern sect and was a blatant scam to the point of absurdity with no mysterious missing pieces to tantalize the imagination.

Maybe this reveals more about Christianity then they would like.

I've read the Book of Mormon, it's weird, almost silly.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

As a Thelemite, we don’t expect to be included in the first place.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›