this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
74 points (97.4% liked)

Just Post

1510 readers
3 users here now

Just post something ๐Ÿ’›

Lemmy's general purpose discussion community with no specific topic.

Sitewide lemmy.world rules apply here.

Additionally, this is a no AI content community. We are here for human interaction, not AI slop! Posts or comments flagged as AI generated will be removed.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 21 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

how in the fuck is it still only 38%?!!

[โ€“] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it slows down the lower it gets, because the less supporters there are, the more loyal they have to be to stick to the president in the first place.

[โ€“] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

so exactly like boiling a pot of shit water. by the end you're just burning literal shit.

[โ€“] Obi@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah, meanwhile French presidents are regularly under 20% approval ratings and that's like, normal.

[โ€“] DisgruntledPelican@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Almost 2/5 people still approve this demential fascist pedo narcissist? How?

[โ€“] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Still 38% terminally stupid idiots.

[โ€“] LemmyBruceLeeMarvin@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Landline owners who answer calls from unknown. The data pool is inherently older and probably retired

[โ€“] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

That is actually a problem. But being stupid is not a privilege of the older generation.

[โ€“] Draegur@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I for one do not know how to do the following, but if anyone who finds this post happens to know how:

i do hope that diligence has been done to ensure these are ACTUAL POLL RESULTS and not just incompetent moronic consulting firms asking generative pretrained transformer large language model hallucination-bots to shit out possible results for them and claim it's a "simulation" of how they THINK poll respondents would indicate.

[โ€“] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's from Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight fame. It's an aggregate of several polls, each of which are given a weight based on accuracy in the past, as well as a correction based on polling method that could skew the result slightly.

Note that these polls do not correspond to 38% of likely voters, as presidential approval tracking asks a much wider segment of the ~~pipularion~~ population beyond likely voters. But yeah, diligence has been done, as accurate as is possible when it comes to polls. I recommend checking out the link; The methodology is explained there better than I could ever do in a two paragraph comment.

[โ€“] moakley@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[โ€“] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago

My autocorrect was on holiday, it seems