A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.
Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".
Getting started on Fediverse;
I think Rimu has tied this warning to the peoplesdispatch.org domain. I think this is a custom thing he did to his instance, because I didn’t find it in the PieFed codebase.
I don’t think People’s Dispatch is even Marxist-Leninist. I think it’s an international anti-imperialist media site. But I wouldn’t assume Rimu could explain the difference or care that there is one. Maybe all anti-imperialists are tankies to him.
I'm happy to explain. You could have just asked, though.
During initial installation PieFed downloads a big list of 3000 right-wing domains from https://github.com/rimu/no-qanon and blocks them all. Admins can unblock them if they want but they would need to do them individually so I bet none do.
The list includes things like fox news, breitbart, etc. Before starting work on PieFed I spent 3? years studying right wing disinformation - qanon, antivax, all that and that blocklist is an output from that. Every site on that list was reviewed personally.
So there's that.
Additionally, I have manually added these warnings (not blocks) onto some domains, for piefed.social only. You can download a list of those warnings from https://join.piefed.social/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/warnings.ods
Most of them are tabloids, AI slop farms and a handful are authoritarian government mouthpieces.
So there's 3000 right wing sites that simply can't be linked to and 47 sites with warnings, about 10% of which are left wing. There's no need to warn for fascism because posts that link to them are not displayed in the first place.
There's an ideological slant to PieFed for sure, and it's very much in favor of the left. That could be why maga.place and lemmychan.org use Lemmy and not PieFed.
I'll take another look at peoplesdispatch and see if there's a less triggering warnings I can put on it.
Here is the (piefed.social only) warnlist in readable format
|-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| aa.com.tr | Turkish state media |
| adele.pages.casa | LLM-generated posts |
| bild.de | A tabloid that has been unfavourably compared to The Sun, and is considered generally unreliable. |
| browsergate.eu | AI slop |
| caixinglobal.com | LLM-generated posts |
| chainalysis.com | LLM-generated posts |
| coindesk.com | Crypto boosters |
| counterpunch.org | Not always reliable. |
| dailysabah.com | Turkey govt properganda |
| dailystar.co.uk | Tabloid |
| electronicintifada.net | Unreliable source |
| english.news.cn | Ok except about anything to do with China |
| eurasiantimes.com | Unreliable source |
| forbes.com | Anyone can write a forbes article. Check the byline to determine whether an article is written by a "Forbes Staff" member, "Contributor", "Senior Contributor", or "Subscriber". |
| fullstackpm.tech | slop |
| gbnews.com | Unreliable source |
| hispantv.com | Unreliable source |
| houseofsaud.com | AI-written posts |
| journal-neo.su | Russian propaganda outlet |
| marathonhandbook.com | AI |
| metro.co.uk | Unreliable source |
| ndtv.com | Modi propaganda. Check MBFC |
| nerds.xyz | AI-written articles |
| news.cgtn.com | Chinese govt propaganda source |
| newsus.cgtn.com | Chinese govt propaganda source |
| nycjournals.com | fake news |
| nypost.com | Unreliable source |
| peoplesdispatch.org | Promotes Marxist-Leninist perspectives |
| plenglish.com | Cuba state media |
| presstv.ir | Iranian state tv |
| rawstory.com | Often inflammitory and kinda biased |
| republicworld.com | Unreliable source |
| sixthtone.com | Singapore govt source |
| tasnimnews.com | Iranian state tv |
| techtimes.com | LLM-generated posts |
| techtrenches.dev | LLM-generated posts |
| telesurenglish.net | Propaganda news channel directly sponsored by the governments of Venezuela and Cuba |
| telesurtv.net | Bolivarian propaganda outlet |
| thatprivacyguy.com | LLM-generated posts |
| theamericanconservative.com | A self-identified "opinionated source" whose factual accuracy has been questioned |
| theintercept.com | |
| the-sun.com | Trash tabloid |
| united24media.com | Factual, but still state-aligned advocacy journalism |
| vgchartz.com | Unreliable source |
| wheresyoured.at | The author of this blog works for AI companies https://www.baldurbjarnason.com/2025/use-the-tools-of-the-job-youve-chosen/#the-unguarded-flank |
| writings.hongminhee.org | LLM generated posts |
Why isn't BBC listed as "British propaganda?" Same with many other western propaganda outlets. It seems like when leftists do it, it's propaganda, but when the west does it it's mostly fine for Rimu.
Bro my "left" leaning dev blocking all enemies of USA. If we put on a map only the highlight ones are permitted:
I'm assuming Rimu meant the left wing of fascism, not in general lol
Reformated it as a table
| url | reason |
|---|---|
| aa.com.tr | Turkish state media |
| adele.pages.casa | LLM-generated posts |
| bild.de | A tabloid that has been unfavourably compared to The Sun, and is considered generally unreliable. |
| browsergate.eu | AI slop |
| caixinglobal.com | LLM-generated posts |
| chainalysis.com | LLM-generated posts |
| coindesk.com | Crypto boosters |
| counterpunch.org | Not always reliable. |
| dailysabah.com | Turkey govt properganda |
| dailystar.co.uk | Tabloid |
| electronicintifada.net | Unreliable source |
| english.news.cn | Ok except about anything to do with China |
| eurasiantimes.com | Unreliable source |
| forbes.com | Anyone can write a forbes article. Check the byline to determine whether an article is written by a "Forbes Staff" member, "Contributor", "Senior Contributor", or "Subscriber". |
| fullstackpm.tech | slop |
| gbnews.com | Unreliable source |
| hispantv.com | Unreliable source |
| houseofsaud.com | AI-written posts |
| journal-neo.su | Russian propaganda outlet |
| marathonhandbook.com | AI |
| metro.co.uk | Unreliable source |
| ndtv.com | Modi propaganda. Check MBFC |
| nerds.xyz | AI-written articles |
| news.cgtn.com | Chinese govt propaganda source |
| newsus.cgtn.com | Chinese govt propaganda source |
| nycjournals.com | fake news |
| nypost.com | Unreliable source |
| peoplesdispatch.org | Promotes Marxist-Leninist perspectives |
| plenglish.com | Cuba state media |
| presstv.ir | Iranian state tv |
| rawstory.com | Often inflammitory and kinda biased |
| republicworld.com | Unreliable source |
| sixthtone.com | Singapore govt source |
| tasnimnews.com | Iranian state tv |
| techtimes.com | LLM-generated posts |
| techtrenches.dev | LLM-generated posts |
| telesurenglish.net | Propaganda news channel directly sponsored by the governments of Venezuela and Cuba |
| telesurtv.net | Bolivarian propaganda outlet |
| thatprivacyguy.com | LLM-generated posts |
| theamericanconservative.com | A self-identified "opinionated source" whose factual accuracy has been questioned |
| theintercept.com | |
| the-sun.com | Trash tabloid |
| united24media.com | Factual, but still state-aligned advocacy journalism |
| vgchartz.com | Unreliable source |
| wheresyoured.at | The author of this blog works for AI companies https://www.baldurbjarnason.com/2025/use-the-tools-of-the-job-youve-chosen/#the-unguarded-flank |
| writings.hongminhee.org | LLM generated posts |
You could have just asked, though.
Oh they could have asked, could they? Like you asked before spreading disinfo about our instance using GenAI for moderation?
Are we supposed to bring back the whole history every time Rimu comments anywhere?
Now, listen, db0: we've discussed a lot in the past, you know I like what you do, I support you and your instance most of the time. But that's also true for Rimu and Piefed. I think it's pointless to try to count points and see who was wrong when by how much. From my perspective, there were issues from all sides during that whole story.
Bringing it up every time anyone involved comments somewhere doesn't seem relevant, and will just start another round of "you were wrong", "I was wrong because you were wrong" etc. It can be endless, and most of the people are tired of that whole story.
Take care.
Are we supposed to bring back the whole history every time Rimu comments anywhere?
When he's being hypocritical AF about people "could have just asked", then yes I think I will.
Rimu discovers that a dbzer0 mod has been using a LLM for moderation. That mod has been somehow pretending to use OpenAI to upset the !fuckai crowd, actually it was a local freeware model. He posts about it.
Talk about underplaying the situation...
Rimu spread purposeful disinfo. He never "just asked". He ignored comments from our admins explicitly telling him he's wrong, because it went against his narrative. Was Purposefully uncharitable so he could spin it as badly as possible. Crossposted to Mastodon in an attempt to initiate a pile-on. I could go on...
He ignored comments from our admins explicitly telling him he's wrong, because it went against his narrative.
Idk, sounds to me like you're equally ignoring comments from other parties telling you you're wrong because it goes against your narrative too. "We investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing" is hardly an argument.
That's why this is a slugfest: "You're wrong! "No, you're wrong!" "No, we told you you're wrong!" "Your telling me that I was wrong was also wrong!"
Reasserting conflicting claims like they're facts isn't worth jack shit.
Except they acted accountably and made efforts to fix the other sides grievances even if they didn’t agree.
Something that has not been returned and has only been met with increasing hostility.
If you're going for the whole history don't forget the nazi smear by some german troll and rimu trying to paint db0 as uniquely ban-happy. Like this has been a busy 10 days or so with shots fired on the FAF day-after-day, this is not history yet but an ongoing barrage from their POV. Also
Rimu discovers that a dbzer0 mod has been using a LLM for moderation
there was no LLM moderation, and rimu knew this before making his post^[https://lem.lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/42212552/20361800]
Also:
I think it's pointless to try to count points and see who was wrong when by how much. From my perspective, there were issues from all sides during that whole story.
We have bent over backwards to de-escalate the situation, both with L.W. and with Rimu. Our admins have stepped down. People changed their usernames. Our admins overruled our mods. Literally creating tension within our instance to maintain relations with the larger fediverse. On the other hand, rimu's deliberate disinfo is still up to this day, without any statements from our team, or correction to their blatant lies. They've even blocked people calling them out, so piefed users can't see this criticism. So don't try to "both sides" me.
Yes, until he fucking relents.
Rimu started shit and he needs to make amends.
Are we supposed to bring back the whole history every time Rimu comments anywhere?
Until Rimu stops acting like this and learns better, yeah.
Apparently piefed smuggles in domains from a completely different repo that clearly isn't just "right-wing domains"^[https://github.com/rimu/no-qanon/blob/master/sources/Fake%20news/README.md] and it requires an admin to unblock them all individually.
Every site on that list was reviewed personally.
so it is a personal semi-hardcoded blocklist, that requires an admin to go through and re-vet every site individually to see if they agree with your assessment or not.
There’s an ideological slant to PieFed for sure, and it’s very much in favor of the left.
lol. lmao even, you put a warning on electronicintifada.net like come on now
It's not smuggled, during initial setup when installing the blocklist it prints this on the screen:
Added 'No-QAnon' blocklist, see https://github.com/rimu/no-qanon
The design is very human...
But why? I don't understand why you want to make your software politically charged. I'm left leaning, but I believe in free speech for all. This makes piefed a censored platform by default. You are manufacturing an echo chamber.
I don't want fascists to benefit from my work. But it's FOSS, so anyone can download and install it, so I made it extremely unattractive to fascists.
There are plenty of other places where people can have "free speech".
Facebook, or reddit, for example. /s
Heh, this puts Piefed in the same basket as Reddit, Facebook etc. for the same reasons you dislike them.
Fork PieFed and remove the 4 lines of code involved in doing this, then. See cli.py, line 160.
IDGAF.
I've rarely seen a crashout so spectacular. Piefed going from the new darling to pariah software in the blink of an eye.
Can you imagine the shitstorm MOG would have raised if the same blocklist was hardcoded in lemmy?
Piefed going from the new darling to pariah software in the blink of an eye.
Super entertaining to watch though.
MOG was upset that Lemmy had a slur filter for a time, they absolutely would crash out if Lemmy devs did anything near this.
And then they will trip over themselves anytime PieFed does really biased moderation and writes things the devs hates into the code so all users are subject to it.
Every time.
You can't fork Reddit or Facebook.
Pievolution is a Piefed forks that removes this feature (as well ad other stuff)
https://codeberg.org/Situation0262/Pievolution
It's not completely ready yet.
By the way, thank you for your work on lazysoci.al
You can't fork Reddit
There's an archive of an old version of Reddit's code available on Github, so theoretically you can fork it, just not the latest version.
And nobody used that as a Reddit alternative, due to missing the federation aspect.
What I should have said above is: you can fork Lemmy, Piefed, Mbin, use that fork on an instance and connect to the Fediverse. That's the major difference with Reddit or Facebook.
The difference between a proprietary, politically charged, censored echo chamber and an open source "do whatever you want" platform should be obvious though.
Free speech is about the right to say what you want, meaning the government isn't supposed to repress you for it, but it doesn't guarantee the opportunity to do so on other people's private platforms. However, in this case, you're free to host your own platform where you can say what you want.
As an aside, I'd like to point out the "Paradox of Tolerance" and the proposed resolutions: If you're an advocate for free speech, extending that freedom to those seeking to undermine it empowers them to use it against that freedom. That way, "free speech for all" is a good intention paving the road to authoritarian hell.
Hence, it is reasonable to deny a platform for those hostile to your principle. Popper frames it as a form of self-defense, to compromise part of the principle to protect the rest. Others frame it as a social contract of mutual respect, whereby the people violating it also forfeit their own right to demand it.
Either way, if "free speech for all" is a self-defeating principle, an open society needs to accept some measure of illiberty for its enemies if it is to be defensible.
Free speech (...) isn’t supposed to (...) guarantee the opportunity to (speak) on other people’s private platforms.
That defense works if PieFed is advertised as Remu's private fiefdom. It's a space for all the Remu fans to hang out and say things Remu wants to hear.
Do you feel that is how PieFed is advertised?
To clarify: you say that by default all PieFed instances don't even allow to link resources considered "right-wing", without an easy way to disable such anti-feature?
If so, it's basically a centralized point for censorship in a decentralized system, which is very antithetical to the spirit of the Fediverse and is something even the very left Lemmy devs prefer to avoid. I see it being very detrimental in its own right.
Shouldn't it be an offered setting instead? Like, "if you want your instance to avoid certain topics, here are filter lists to freely enable or disable"?
Much can be said about the definition of left and the way Marxists you are addressing don't see "liberal" as "left" to begin with.
What matters, though, is that you end up projecting a certain personal, even if somewhat educated, bias onto both PieFed as a project (banning right-wing outlets from even being linked to, globally), and the flagship instance (making warnings about Marxist-inclined outlets). This is very unwelcome for many, myself included, and, as previously mentioned, antithetical to what Fediverse is and what it stands for.
It depends on your definition of easy. Here is the admin UI for unbanning domains.
Also they can go into the database and empty the domain table.
Easy as in "there is a UI button/switch during initial setup". Essentially, not banning all these domains should be equally as easy as banning them.
I don't believe software can be neutral. By making banning them equally easy as not, we're saying that those choices are of equal worth - doing that is taking a side and it's the side of giving fascists an easier way in. Nope! That's how Mastodon gets forked into Truth Social.
Interesting how this thread started out about me being too right wing and now for other people it's about me being too left wing. Heh.
Can't please everyone and I'm not trying to.
Interesting how this thread started out about me being too right wing and now for other people it’s about me being too left wing. Heh.
It's not about that, really. You'll always be too left for some and too right for others. The problem is a single person, regardless of their views, policing what others get to see or not to see, on all instances, globally.
Decentralization of power is the name of the game for the Fediverse - that's why most people are here in the first place. They escaped Reddit, with its sweeping bans over the "wrong" opinions. They escaped Xitter, with a megalomaniac policing what everyone can say. They are tired of this, they don't need this, they despise this.
You are the developer of a leading Threadiverse software. You contribute heavily to this world, and your decisions affect not only your project - they ripple through the whole thing. With an open heart, I call you to be open with the community you serve, and to give them what they need - open choice. Stripping them of that undermines trust in Threadiverse, tramples the spirit of freedom and tinkering, and brings drama and division instead.
If you are genuinely concerned about right-wing folks stepping in to destroy the Threadiverse - look around. Lemmy, Mbin have no guardrails, they are open to everyone - and yet, the whole right wing is like two obscure instances, barely known or accessible. Instance admins take great care to curate their instances and purge such spaces, and users double this. The very nature of Threadiverse - a place for the people - makes the very people you align with gravitate towards it. And they know full well what worth there is in each choice.
The reason the decisions of yours got so much resonance is exactly because people care. They care about PieFed, and, at the same time, they care about Threadiverse. They enjoy your work, and it brings unique developments not seen elsewhere. But if it keeps on these rails, as an ideological and opinionated project, it risks falling out of favor and into obscurity. None of us want that, and so, we call again: please, open PieFed for choice. You may suggest blocklists, even offer them as default - just don't bake them in and make a clear option for opt-out. Recognize some people need to make this choice. Hopefully, you trust your very own community to do what's right.
Wait so there is nothing in the code to check if the list on that repo got updated since after the setup? Are the admins supposed to maintain their own list or not?
“There’s and ideological slant to PieFed for sure”
Slant?!?! It’s a giant goddamn left-wing circle jerk propaganda machine 🤣
So ignoring the censorship aspect entirely: Admins are asked if they wish to block right wing domains, and then if they say yes, the software blocks (some right wing domains and) left wing investigative journalism sites like The Gray Zone. Russian news sites like RT, Sputnik and TASS, Harry Potter related sites, all of Telegram, vk.com (Russian-language social media site), Video hosts like Peertube and Rumble.
Is the whole reason you made this list so you could sneak in some personal vendettas? Also pretty suspicious that the BBC isn't on there. Or CNN. Or WaPo. Or Ynet. Or Mako. Or Times of Israel. Or DW. Given the era we live in, and their complicity in genocide, surely that'd be a higher priority than almost any other website if you're aiming to block harmful news sites with right wing editorial lines.
There’s an ideological slant to PieFed for sure, and it’s very much in favor of the left. That could be why maga.place and lemmychan.org use Lemmy and not PieFed.
PieFed bakes in preferences against left wing groups, and you've been launching a crusade against anarchist instances lately. As much as you believe yourself to be left, you've done your best to left-punch wherever you can, and have unilaterally made decisions greatly impacting the functionality of PieFed to suit your overwhelmingly liberal views. This isn't even getting into how you agree with racist conspiracy theories like the idea that China is kidnapping people for organ harvesting.
Also, it's nice that you admit that PieFed has an ideological slant and that you do develop PieFed with that in mind, socsa swore up and down that that wasn't the case for some reason.
It's also very telling they named it noqanon.
While sounds great weird that would trigger ml warnings as no one would consider qanon that
All the bullshit they say about silencing and 1984 is as always, a classic case of projection.
Please enlighten us on where we should be getting the full objective unbiased reality from, the New York Times maybe? God forbid a media takes a pro working class / global south bias instead of the usual neoliberal status quo ideology. Call them out on it and they'll deny they even follow any ideology, they're just being Objective™.
Are you sure this is a "warning"? /s
Sounds like an indicator of quality, instead. Even the icon is in red, the color of hope.
This is a strong and succinct argument, cheers.
We need peoplesdispatch.org I think it's valuable thing to have a take on events from their angle. Yet it needs to be read with an understanding that they have an angle. Using the warning icon to provide that understanding is clunky and wasn't really intended for that purpose. There has been some drift in the usage away from the original idea behind the feature.
One day it might be good to have a different icon for providing context, separate from providing warnings.
Will you provide context for state run Zionist propaganda like the BBC?
Title
Noooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!