this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
221 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

88734 readers
2898 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 74 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (19 children)

Netflix will win the suit. A single producer delivering by hand an unencrypted, unprotected DCP is not standard operating procedure in Hollywood. Netflix would have expected the distributor or studio to deliver a case containing a specialized hardened drive, encrypted files unique to that specific copy, meant in some cases to be played only once directly off the drive. A solo producer rolling up with unencrypted, untracked files is wildly negligent by industry standards. Op-Fortitude is just trying to cover their ass with this suit, and it's probably too late.

Also as someone who has worked in film I found this line from the Netflix exec humorous: "We’ve been working through this with out security teams to no luck. Our piracy teams are on high alert with the breach and will monitor." Yeah no, what's been happening is that the security and piracy teams are dealing with a lot of strung out high-demand verbose producers and then turning around and going about their day as usual, good riddance.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, not the same industry, but I’d never dream of putting valuable stuff on an unencrypted drive, shocked anyone has somehow missed all the stories of laptops getting stolen with secret documents on etc over the years.

[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One of my coworkers was once tasked with taking an encrypted database over to a hospital via sneakernet. He posted a selfie to twitter while on the subway with the handcuffed device, saying he was doing James Bond missions or something to that affect. He got a call SO FAST by our irate director asking him WTF he thought he was doing.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

handcuffed device

I'm surprised he wasn't stopped. I can't imagine the authorities would look very kindly on someone handcuffed to a thing they're holding, encrypted database or no.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can't imagine the authorities would look very kindly on someone handcuffed to a thing they're holding, encrypted database or no.

Why?

[–] T156@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It'd seem a bit suspicious, wouldn't it?

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 2 points 2 months ago

And what law would it violate?

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't see how or why. You're obviously carrying something of value. If anything you'd be more concerned about attracting criminal attention. You're not doing anything illegal, and no cop wants to mess with anybody rich enough to afford handcuffed couriers.

[–] eneff@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

No, why would it?

load more comments (17 replies)