this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
490 points (99.4% liked)

World News

56448 readers
2612 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced on Wednesday that his government would not purchase early-warning-radar planes from the United States, opting instead for a European model.

Canada will purchase Swedish Saab's GlobalEye, which is based on the Canadian-manufactured Bombardier Global 6500 jet.

Tensions between the US and Canada have been high since Donald Trump launched a trade war against the US' northern neighbor and even suggested that Canada should become the 51st US state, which caused widespread outrage in Canada, just as Carney was seeking the post of prime minister and succeeded in getting elected to it.

Since then, the Canadian government has also opted ot review the planned purchase of US F-35 fighter jets to explore other options.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Akh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Makes sense. Endless grafting with no real innovation has made US mil tec questionable. F-35 was downed in its first actual combat mission that was not a balloon.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So much going on in that little comment of yours. The F-35 borrowed from the F-22 while reducing cost to become the JSF. It was effectively a downgrade on purpose

The F-22 was optimized for

  • air superiority
  • speed
  • maneuverability

The F-35 was optimized for

  • multirole strike missions
  • affordability (relative to the F-22)
  • exportability

Also, your claim the F-35 was “downed in its first actual combat mission that was not a balloon” is not true. (A) There is still no confirmed combat shootdown of an F-35. And (B) F-35s have conducted non-balloon-related combat operations for years in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan.

So.. not sure what you think you know, but it seems to be incorrect.

[–] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is still no confirmed combat shootdown of an F-35.

And you think you're going to have this data made available during a war?

And (B) F-35s have conducted non-balloon-related combat operations for years in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Against an enemy with no air defense. A biplane wouldn't have been shot down either.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, how about from the folks who shot it down. That wasn’t parts from a different plane, or AI generated.

[–] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Sure, how about from the folks who shot it down.

Put it next to the claims of simultaneous laundry fires aboard US warships.

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] credo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They said they did. Still no proof

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] credo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What the fuck is wrong with you people? Iran can provide the proof. Why the fuck would you continue to believe something after the initial “proof” was shown to be fake?

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not if it went down in the gulf. Also if it made it back to base and then was deemed to be beyond repair that still counts as a kill.

[–] Killer57@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The f-35 is an indescribable wastage of money

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You're getting downvoted by simps who don't know the history of this turd, they keep quoting design stats as if they are true.

F-35s were stuck over a year at Lockheed on software glitches, and they can't fix it. Pentagon report.

US Navy even rejected them and refused to accept delivery.

This is a fucking Edsel.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean that's just incorrect. I hate the US military industrial complex as much as the next person, but the US has easily some of the best tech in the world, in most military aspects. Space-based, air, land, sea surface, and undersea.

Now, is it extremely overpriced and really bad value for the tech? Absolutely, the corruption has seeped in from the complete government capture of the MIC.

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] zd9@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Respectfully, I don't think you really even understand this field. Has the leadership fucked things up to a huge extent? Yes.

Does that destroy all of the massive R&D investments in military tech over the last 2 decades (since 9/11 specifically)? Of course not.